<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Graphql on Commentary of Takao</title><link>https://takao.blog/en/tags/graphql/</link><description>Recent content in Graphql on Commentary of Takao</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><copyright>Commentary of Takao</copyright><lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2026 23:11:50 +0900</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://takao.blog/en/tags/graphql/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>GraphQL vs REST in 2024: Making the Right Choice</title><link>https://takao.blog/en/web/graphql-vs-rest-2024/</link><pubDate>Tue, 03 Dec 2024 00:00:00 +0900</pubDate><guid>https://takao.blog/en/web/graphql-vs-rest-2024/</guid><description>&lt;img src="https://takao.blog/img/thumnail.webp" alt="Featured image of post GraphQL vs REST in 2024: Making the Right Choice" /&gt;&lt;h2 id="introduction"&gt;Introduction
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;The debate between GraphQL and REST has matured significantly by 2024. Both approaches have evolved, adopted features from each other, and found their niches. The question is no longer which is universally superior, but which fits your specific project context. This article provides a balanced comparison to help teams make informed API architecture decisions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;h2 id="state-of-rest-in-2024"&gt;State of REST in 2024
&lt;/h2&gt;&lt;p&gt;REST remains the dominant API paradigm, powering the majority of web APIs. Its strengths lie in maturity, simplicity, and universal HTTP caching. The OpenAPI 3.1 specification brought JSON Schema compatibility, improving interoperability. Tooling like Swagger UI, Redoc, and Postman collections provide excellent documentation and testing capabilities.&lt;/p&gt;</description></item></channel></rss>